Should we print only letters that praise us?

26 November 2006

Should newspapers publish letters critical of what they do, letters critical of stands they take, letters telling reporters and subs and correspondents and the editor to go take a bloody hike?

The answer is obvious: of course, we should. That’s the whole point of good journalism: to give the view, the opposite view and the other view (which incidentally is the slogan of ‘Al Jazeera’), not just to stick your neck in the sand and pretend you are right all the time.

But take one look at newspapers around you and you will find that rare is the publication that lets the reader do the talking. Indeed, if you look at one Bangalore paper we cannot name here, the only letters to the editor published are those which start off saying, “Kudos to the editor for another riveting column…” Clearly, the readers are smart. At least they know what kind of letter to write to get published.

But are we as smart in publishing only such letters? Is that why we are around? To publish sugary-sweet praise? Saccharine platitudes? To pretend we are the ultimate arbiters of the world, and all that we do is right and unquestionable?

Four days ago, we made a front-page “flyer”—that’s the story that runs on top of the page—of the report alleging that Rahul Mahajan had been accused of beating his wife, Shweta.

The logic behind putting it on page one was twofold: one, it’s an interesting glamourous story that shows the Achilles’ heel of the well-heeled; and two, because here was the son of the man who could have been prime minister, and the man whose sister was only recently inducted into the BJP.First, he gets caught with cocaine and champagne at home. And then this.

But readers–or at least some of them—didn’t join the dots. And three of them wrote to us criticising the page one display. It would have been convenient and comfortable to pretend we didn’t receive them, but who are we kidding? Ourselves? So, we boxed the three critical letters on our letters page yesterday much to some people’s chagrin.

Chagrin, because most other Bangalore papers too put the Mahajan story on page one, but not one of them has published similar letters. Yet. Either their readers are far less sensitive than ours or far more permissive; or they have not found the time or space to accommodate them. Yet.

At least one reader Dr Mallesh Rao from Mysore seems to have caught the drift of what we are doing. He has written a letter praising us for printing letters of the editorial policy. Guess where that letter is going?

About these ads

5 Responses to “Should we print only letters that praise us?”

  1. VYOMKESH Says:

    I think THE HINDU has all its praise for appointing a READER’S EDITOR to give it a vibrant and more empathetic approach to the inner voice rendered by its’s exclusive readers. Yet, it hasn’t got out of it’s traditional stigma of not tolerating any comments on the Senior Columnists’.

  2. M K Vidyaranya Says:

    No, we should not, as it would amount to self praising.
    A sincere policy of the Newspaper would be to publish both boquets and brickbats.
    Here ,I would like to recall the famous statement made by the great American Journalist Walter Lippmann who had said, ” The news and truth are not the same thing”.

  3. Shyam Says:

    India’s best editor (you know who) knows it too well. The best pages in his magazine are obviously those carrying the readers’ letters.

  4. chandu Says:

    i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno’t mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.


  5. Majority of my friends always wrote letters to the editors, only to get their name published and not with the real purpose of expressing their feedback on some issue. So, I feel it is impossible to come to a conclusion by going through few letters sent by the readers, learning that are they truely praising or criticising, it’s really a billion dollar question sir!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,210 other followers

%d bloggers like this: