‘Conventional journalism serves the powerful’

28 August 2007

PALAGUMMI SAINATH, the Magsaysay Award winning rural affairs editor of The Hindu, spoke to Sunil Sethi, the books editor of NDTV, over the weekend, on why he chose to do what he chose to do: report from India’s remotest villages on the poor and the marginalised:

***

“In 1983-84, we had a very large drought in India. I was a very conventionally trained reporter… news agencies, newspapers, etc. I went out to cover it.

“The power of what I experienced… I found that the kind of journalism we practiced was completely inadequate to express that power. Because we end up always giving the final word to figures of authority.

“‘The collector said’, ‘the prime minister said’, although the collector may be a bloke who came there just 15 days ago. We privilege that collector’s statement over that of a farmer who has tilled the land there for 45 years. That’s stupid, that’s bad journalism.

“That’s when I came to the conclusion that conventional journalism is about the service of power. Journalism has two streams, journalism and stenography. We (in conventional journalism) really function as stenographers to the powerful.

“Again, in 1991, hunger deaths surfaced in independent india for the first time. This was just 90 kms from the nation’s richest city. We all wrote stories, won awards, but I was thoroughly ashamed. Had we reported better, those children could have been alive.

“Indian media is very good at covering events, not processes… It is a  paradox of the Indian media that good talent has come in at a time of great bankruptcy of media leadership. The dumbing down process is also looking at how to dumb down journalists. We take out them out of school/ college but the fundamanetal feature is the disconnect between mass media and mass reality.”

Also read: India is a nation of two planets: rich and poor

Ramon Magsaysay Award for P. Sainath

About these ads

One Response to “‘Conventional journalism serves the powerful’”

  1. mathihalli madan mohan Says:

    Sainath is qutie prophetic on the kind of journalism practiced in India. It is nothing but stenopgraphy. The power dictates and the media gulps and the reports are totally dehumanised and the human element is missing .

    It is also true that there is total bankruptcy of leadership in journalism in general and reporting in particular. It is again because the mediorcity has risen to the top and it does not tolerate the talented youngsters going away from the beaten track lest the chips are out. It is very difficult for a bubbling journalist go out of the beatn track and stand on his own. Most of them after a bit of resistance thrown in their towel and become part of the system.

    Not all the entrants have the kind of grit, the determination and insight that Mr Sainath has brought into the realm of reporting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,696 other followers

%d bloggers like this: