Pallava Bagla bags ‘Oscar’ of science journalism

22 December 2010

Noted science journalist Pallava Bagla has become the first Indian to bag the David Perlman award for excellence in science journalism, given out annually by the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

The award, described as the “Oscars of earth and climate science”, was presented to Bagla (in picture, right) at a gala event held in San Francisco on December 15.

The high honour comes as a recognition for Bagla’s expose of the error made by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which, in its 2007 report, had grossly over-estimated the melt rate of Himalayan glaciers predicting that they will disappear by 2035.

Ultimately in January 2010, the IPCC offered a “regret” for this error.

The Perlman award selection committee applauded Bagla’s articles for addressing “a very serious issue in the earth sciences.”

“His articles serve as a reminder to journalists to question sources, to think harder about the agendas and ideas of those people about whom they are reporting, and to stop the steamroller of opinions or ideas when the facts just don’t back them up. Although Bagla’s articles reveal embarrassing foibles of scientists, ultimately they also illustrate science’s ability to self-correct.”

The first of Bagla’s two articles “No Sign of Himalayan Melt Down, Indian Report Finds“, was published in the journal Science, exploring dissent among glaciologists regarding the claim by the IPCC that Himalayan glaciers would imminently disappear.

The second article, “Himalayan Glacier Deadline ‘Wrong‘”, published by BBC News, reported on an apparent typographical error in the IPCC claim which appears to explain the panel’s controversial, 300-year acceleration of when Himalayan glaciers are expected to vanish.

***

Photograph: Pallava Bagla with the plaque of the David Perlman award for excellence in science journalism and Michael J. McPhaden, president of the American Geophysical Union

About these ads

2 Responses to “Pallava Bagla bags ‘Oscar’ of science journalism”

  1. Subir Ghosh Says:

    Why are you calling it the Oscar? Call it the Pulitzer of science journalism, if you may.

    • Vibhuti Says:

      It is not Oscar nor Pulitzer…It is like a award given to a school children of an un- known institution.We are doing very less but projecting very tall.Pallava is projecting things like Indian electronic media???????????


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,439 other followers

%d bloggers like this: