‘Has Justice Katju been appointed by Stalin?’

3 November 2011

The “tendentious and offensiveremarks of the new chairman of the Press Council of India, Justice Markandey Katju, on the state of the media and the quality of journalists—and his articulation for greater powers, including over television news channels—has predictably, a) touched a raw nerve, b) stirred a hornet’s nest, c) set the cat among the paper tigers, d) exposed the media’s achilles’ heel, or e) all of the above.

The Editors’ Guild of India*, the Broadcast Editors’ Asociation, the Indian Journalists’ Association have all reacted sharply, while public opinion seems to be on the side of the press council chief, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India. To a question on the CNN-IBN programme “Face the Nation” last night, 73% viewers said there was no need for Justice Katju to apologise (but who believes these polls any way?).

While Justice Katju tries to “place” an article in newspapers to further elucidate his views and some in the media say he said nothing that should not have been said, at least two Delhi-based English newspapers have thought the controversy fit enough for editorials.

Mint, the business daily from the Hindustan Times stable, has an edit titled “Educating Justice Katju“:

“Perhaps Justice Katju is not aware of what journalists do. The basic task of any journalist is to gather news and report it. Most of his or her working day is spent doing that. This is true of the cub reporter and of the senior editor.

“It is true that newsrooms, newspaper columns and TV channels are noisy. But that is only a reflection of the society at large: journalists don’t exist in ether. What is true of Indians is true of Indian journalists.

“Now it would be wonderful if all journalists could appreciate Caravaggio, read Catullus’s poetry, know Thucydides by the chapter and creatively use advanced macroeconomics to interpret the daily ebb and flow of events. It would not only make the press a more cultured institution, but possibly make India a better country. It is also true that few, if any, journalists are enabled to do that.

“These are expensive tastes that require extensive (and yes, expensive) education. Few journalists can afford that, even if most of them want to. The reason: there’s a huge divergence between personal and social returns from such education. This is a wider problem and it afflicts many other professions. To blame the press for being “illiterate” is misinformed, if not downright wrong.”

Mail Today, the compact daily from the India Today group, pulls no punches. “He doesn’t deserve to be press council chief” is its rather straightforward headline:

“Justice Katju’s attitude towards the media is one of undisguised disgust. Clearly, he seems to have been misled about his work as the PCI Chairman.

“He seems to think that he has been appointed by Josef Stalin to forcefully “ modernise” the media. Actually he has been appointed under the Press Council of India Act and his main job is to ensure that the press remains free in this country.

“A second task is that of raising the standards of the media discourse, not through chastisement— where, in any case he can merely admonish— but dialogue and persuasion. But this is something you cannot do if you hold the media in utter contempt.

“It would appear that Justice Katju, who had a streak of the self- publicist even as a judge, is pursuing a bizarre agenda which may end up embarrassing those who pushed for his appointment as the Chairman of the Press Council of India.”

* Disclosures apply

Also read: ‘I have a poor opinion of most media people’

Editors’ Guild of India takes on Press Council chief

TV news channel editors too blast PCI chief

Raju Narisetti: ‘Good journalists, poor journalism, zero standards’

Aakar Patel: Indian journalism is regularly second-rate

About these ads

4 Responses to “‘Has Justice Katju been appointed by Stalin?’”

  1. mahesh Vijapurkar Says:

    Editors had better listen to what the people say about the media, about media credibility, about the usefulness of media before the speak about what views Katju holds.

    Katju was saying much the same thing, and Katju is being reacted to. People, who want to avoid constipation by buying newspapers, more to meet a habit than a need, have despite that anger, been kinder to media than media deserve.

  2. Law of Omerta Says:

    “He seems to think that he has been appointed by Josef Stalin to forcefully “ modernise” the media. ”

    —-
    I like the above quoted line. Now the question is who (according to Mail Today) is Josef Stalin.

    Perhaps we should find out who appointed Katju, then we will know who according to Mail Today is the Josef Stalin of India.

    I guess Indian media has now lost its sense of humour…. they can’t take any criticism.

  3. Prof. M. R. Dua Says:

    I admire Justice Katju for speak from his heart about the sad state of the contents of at least two prominent dailies of Delhi. The kind of supplements they carry deserve to be straightaway cast to the wastepaper basket. If one keenly accesses the contents of these (daily) glamour /soft porn supplements, one will at once come to the conclusion that these (contents) are to feed the ‘uneducated’ people, and are authored by totally intellectually bankrupt boys and girls, who do their job, or are perhaps asked to write for earning a few rupees for their masters.
    Justice Katju has put pressed the right button to reprimand these hacksters, and those who print them. We hope print media will learn something from Katju’s ‘ truth ‘.
    Finally, has any of these hack writers ever seen the highly enlightening, profusely rich, intellectually satisfying contents of the globally-famous dailies such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal, London Times?
    Please, Justice Katju, buy them a copy each of the Sunday New York Times and supply these to these youngsters. They will know what journalism should be.
    It’s time they’re reformed, shown what great journalism can be and should be.

  4. Kerala Varma Says:

    Justice Katju’s views on journalists in general apparently is not beholden to the print and visual media.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,439 other followers

%d bloggers like this: