The true depth of an employer-employee relationship is never quite revealed during the course of the latter’s employment, generally speaking. It is only after the two have parted ways, when the two parties take their gloves off and shadow-box each other, does it become clear whether it was good cohabitation or a charade.
India’s bestknown business investigative journalist, Sucheta Dalal, left India’s largest English daily, The Times of India, several years ago, after a nine-year stint during which she also played a stellar role in unravelling the securities scam involving the now deceased Harshad Mehta.
Since her departure from the paper, Dalal has moved to other things, writing columns and books, setting up a magazine. In recent times, she has played an important role in exposing the “private treaties” of her former employer that has eaten into the vitals of media ethics in boom-time.
Now, ToI has hit back, below the belt.
In an interview with Nikhil Pahwa‘s newly launched medianama, S. Sivakumar, the CEO-designate of ToI’s private treaties division, is asked about a November 2007 letter from Economic Times editor Rahul Joshi that Dalal quoted in an article, that firmly established how the private treaties were casting a dark shadow over the group’s editorial sanctity.
“Because you have an agenda. You know Sucheta was working with us… I don’t know whether you know it or not, but she was working with us and I didn’t want to talk abot the Harshad Mehta scam, since you are recording, I didn’t want to go on aboUt that. There’s a lot of background, and under what circumstances she left the organisation.” (emphasis added)
The defamatory insinuation has justly got Dalal (who was given the Femina Woman of Substance award for the expose) fuming.
In response, she writes back:
“I have a letter from the company to say “we treasure” your association with us when I left the Times of India. Do they hand out such letters to all and sundry? It may also interest people to know that Ashok Jain, the late Chairman of the Times Group, had asked me to draft a Code of Ethics for journalists—maybe that too was part of their poor judgement.”
Warned of “recourse”, Sivakumar has sent a clarification:
“As a policy we never comment on any of our employees either currently working with us or had worked with us in the past…. We as an organisation respect all journalists.”
Sivakumar’s offensive comments have been struck through, and comments disallowed for the piece.
Read the full exchange: ‘There are two currencies for advertising: cash and treaties’
Also read: Forget the news, you can’t trust the ads either
‘The first casualty of a cosy deal is credibility’
‘Indian media in deeply murky ethical territory’